The public petitions system has now closed ahead of the Scottish Parliament elections on 7 May 2026. It is not possible to submit a new petition to the Scottish Parliament or sign a petition until after the election.
The petitions system will reopen at the start of the new parliamentary session.
For more information about the petitions process, please contact the committee team at petitions.committee@parliament.scot.
For more information about the election campaign period and the dissolution of the current parliament, please visit the Scottish Parliament’s Election 2026 webpage: https://www.parliament.scot/msps/elections/election-2026
Closed petition PE2181: Remove teachers’ ability to backdate and alter school records
Calling on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to introduce measures to stop teachers from backdating or altering school records in SEEMiS and any other education management information systems.
Background information
Scottish schools use the SEEMiS application for school records. It’s essential and in the public interest that school records are accurate like other public systems of records such as the NHS or Police Scotland.
Teachers, unlike the police or NHS staff, are able to use functionality to alter a record after it was created. One of our members took a council to court to prove this, after the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman wrongly relied on school records our member knew had not been recorded contemporaneously. Following a court order he discovered that over 10 school records had been created and made to look like they had been recorded before alleged safeguarding failures caused significant harm to his child. We have since discovered that this has been going on for years.
A recent response from the Information Commissioner’s Office to a complaint we raised on this matter recognised that, in the above case, the council’s practice did not comply with data protection legislation. The practice is also open to abuse, a risk to children, and it must be stopped.
This petition was considered by the Scottish Parliament
25 signatures